Metro

St. Louis, Illinois Metro Retirement Score

St. Louis is a stronger fit for retirees who prioritize affordability and healthcare access, but it is less appealing for those who prioritize mild weather or a lower-risk profile.

Overall Retirement Score
63
Around average

Quick takeaway

Best for: affordability, healthcare access, Midwestern practicality

Think twice if: mild weather matters most, you want the lowest regional risk

Score breakdown

Affordability
80
Very affordable
Healthcare Access
74
Above average
Climate Comfort
52
Around average
Disaster Risk
56
Around average
Air Quality
54
Around average
Retiree Fit
63
Around average

At a glance

Median rent
$1,240
Median home value
$265,000
Age 65+
18%
Climate
Four seasons, warm summers
Healthcare
Strong regional access
Risk
Mixed storm and heat tradeoffs
Air quality
Around average

Good fit for

Retirees who want affordability and healthcare access without moving to a much smaller market.

Less ideal for

Retirees who care more about mild weather or especially low hazard exposure.

Biggest strengths

  • Affordability is a real advantage.
  • Healthcare access is stronger than many similarly priced markets.
  • The overall profile is practical for retirees who value cost control.

Biggest tradeoffs

  • Climate is only around average.
  • Risk is mixed rather than especially favorable.
  • Air quality is more neutral than a strength.

Affordability

Affordability is one of the stronger parts of the profile and helps set St. Louis apart from more expensive larger markets.

Healthcare Access

Healthcare access is also a clear strength and supports the metro's practical retirement case.

Climate Comfort

Climate comfort is around average. Four-season living works here, but summer heat and winter swings remain part of the tradeoff.

Disaster Risk

Risk is mixed, with storm and heat considerations keeping the metro from rating as a true low-risk option.

Air Quality

Air quality is around average and does not drive the profile strongly in either direction.

Retiree Fit

Retiree fit is above average enough to support the metro's practical appeal, even if it is not a classic retiree destination.

Similar places to consider

Chicago, Illinois Metro

Similar for Illinois access to services, but with a much different cost profile.

Indianapolis, Indiana Metro

Similar for Midwestern practicality, but with different healthcare and climate tradeoffs.

Columbia, Missouri Metro

Similar for affordability and practicality, but smaller and calmer.

How to interpret this retirement score

Use the overall score as a quick summary, then look at the category scores to see whether affordability, healthcare access, climate comfort, air quality, disaster risk, or retiree fit is driving the result. A place can still be a good fit for you even if one category is a clear tradeoff.

Best next step after this page

Use compare pages when you have two realistic finalists. If you are still building the shortlist, use the related rankings and the broader state page to find nearby or similarly ranked alternatives.

Frequently asked questions

Is St. Louis a good place to retire?

It can be a strong fit for retirees who value affordability and healthcare access more than mild weather.

What is the main tradeoff here?

The main tradeoff is that climate and risk are only middling compared with the stronger affordability case.

What to do next

Use this page as a narrowing step, then compare it directly against nearby or similarly ranked counties and metros. The overall score is the summary; the category scores explain the tradeoffs.